RSH Consumer Standard theme

Safety and Quality across England

Safety and Quality groups every determination that falls under the RSH Safety and Quality Standard: building safety, repairs, damp and mould, and the decency and condition of homes.

The sector picture

11.1% of safety and quality determinations end in a maladministration finding.

Across 7,915 Housing Ombudsman determinations in this theme, the maladministration and severe-maladministration finding rate is 11.1%, against a sector-wide rate of 8.7% across all themes, and this theme runs higher than the sector overall. Aggregate counts only; no landlord is named.

Over the last six months the finding rate rose 24.2 percentage points against the prior six months.

QuarterDeterminationsFinding rate
2024-Q46290.8%
2025-Q13460.0%
2025-Q26560.1%
2025-Q37460.3%
2025-Q41,08822.7%
2026-Q174120.4%

Why it matters

This is the consumer standard most directly about whether homes are safe and decent to live in. A high finding rate across it points to systemic asset-management and compliance weakness, which the regulator can act on through inspection.

What good looks like

  • Building-safety compliance (the “big six”) is complete, evidenced and in date.
  • Stock-condition data is current and drives a funded investment programme.
  • Hazards are risk-assessed and remediated to a published standard.

See your organisation

How does your organisation compare on safety and quality?

The public view is sector-aggregate. Get your organisation’s own finding rate on this theme, your peer cohort and your trajectory in a free account. We’ll email a link to finish.

Email me my safety and quality position

See where your organisation sits against the sector on this theme. We'll send a link. No password needed yet.

We'll email a secure link to finish. No password needed yet.

Source

Figures are derived from the Housing Ombudsman’s published determinations. See the data sources and methodology for how this is calculated. Per-landlord intelligence is for signed-in housing professionals; the public view is sector-aggregate by design.